1
Anonymous
@soapbox
07 Feb 2012 6:18PM
• 4,927 views • 4 attachments

I am upset that ML is considering censoring the boards, especially when they claim it is over American legal activity. Here in the "good 'ol" US of A, at least last time I checked, we had these lovely pieces of paper, with names like:

Declaration of Independence,
Bill of Rights,

and last but not least, the United States Constitution.

And again, last time I checked, the first and one of the most critical Amendments to this piece of doctrine, is Freedom of Religion, Press, and Expression. Last time I checked this isn't a dictatorship, and we, as citizens, have a right to say anything we feel.

Confessions being censored is literally censorship for the sake there of. If someone posts that they raped 30 children, it is nothing more than a story unless evidence is provided, and is protected by constitutional law. So every movie and book that deals with similiar topics should be destroyed (Fahrenheit 451 anyone)? I think not.

Also, have any of you considered that maybe, just maybe, being able to openly share these obsessions anonymously may in fact keep some of these people from actually doing these things, finding cathartic satisfaction from being able to voice it?

You tout that this is a moral-free zone, where if it is legal it stays. Well I call you out on it now then. Will you be pioneers, standing up for the rights of the every-man, or will you bend over for Big Brother some more and let them rape one of the last uncensored areas left on the net for people with strong sexual tendencies in this country? You should really ask yourself what it is you actually stand for, and why you want any of us as members in the first place. Because I am willing to bet that the majority of so-called "anonymous" threads here are posted by ACTUAL members. You are selling out the very people who made this site thrive.

reply favorite add to gallery permalink Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.

Replies 71

1
Anonymous
08 Feb 2012 5:35AM

Nobody dares to reply in case they get banned.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
08 Feb 2012 6:34AM

No, it's because half the readers don't know what you are talking about and the other half are barfing at all the drama and cliches.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
2
Anonymous
08 Feb 2012 6:48AM

The constitution prohibits government censorship, it doesn't require Motherless to do or not do anything to enable your free speech. If you run your own servers and the government tries to censor you, that invokes constitutional protection, which has been historically limited in cases of public danger (yelling "fire" in a crowd) or speech that is entirely offensive with no redeeming value.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
2
Anonymous
17 Feb 2012 5:16PM

We have a winner. The truth is Dewez and the admins (or the owners/operators of any site) can decide what they do and do not want on their site. Period.
Fuck I hate when Americans go on about their constitution when they don't even know when it does and does not apply.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
08 Feb 2012 7:35AM

This is the third time I've said this and it keeps getting deleted...
This post by TheFapMaster (see pic) confirms that Motherless has 'sold out' to the advertisers.
Fully legal but not allowed on Motherless.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
08 Feb 2012 10:21AM

I saw that and it was the basis for me to create this thread.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
08 Feb 2012 7:57AM

When did motherless become a "business" and stop being a safe haven to those who wish to discuss their fantasies in a safe environment... If they take that away how many of our members will take their dangerous fantasies into the real world... Motherless is supposed to be a moral free outlet for these things.. Censor us and you will lose your business...

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
2
Anonymous
08 Feb 2012 8:10AM

Motherless has always been a business the only thing that stops you realising that is that you don't pay for it the advertisers do.

In order to be allowed to continue to exist Motherless has to comply with the law.

NOW HERE IS THE BIT THAT SOME PEOPLE CAN NOT UNDERSTAND

As new laws are passed or existing ones are changed the site has to change with it or be closed down. For example recently US law was changed to classify any depiction of a person under legal age even if drawn or CGI as old, When this happened the site had to act to remove it.
The site will also be affected massively if PIPA/SOPA pass into law.

You have to remember that even if this site chose to test the law and continue to allow something that LEA/FBI etc had advised them they should stop that the advertisers who provide the revinue to allow the site to operate would pull out because under US law any person or organisation that provides funding to another organisation who breaks the law is also legally liable and would be prosecuted ( Thats why all the card companies had to ban payments to wikileaks )
.

Slowly slowly catchee munkey,slowly slowly also makes for a relaxing BJ

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
08 Feb 2012 9:36AM

But what was stated had nothing to do with images, and does not constitute harassment under any current legal criteria (wikileaks). And advertisers arent being listed as the reason for the censoring, it is being stated by The FapMaster, that it is directly related to American legal issues.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
2
Anonymous
08 Feb 2012 8:05AM

Show me where the harm and exploitation of children fits into your Declaration of Independence you stupid fuck..Go sell your pedo values somewhere else..Motherless Doesnt have to pull any content but on the other hand getting busted and going to jail for owning a site that has old in its content..Well just sucks..This site is the owners buisness..And All you pedophiles are just trying to ruin it for him....

Go back to usenet and quit crying you cant see your little naked children you sick fucks

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
08 Feb 2012 9:45AM

Words arent considered old and never will be since words require real acts to happen to be stated. While I am defending "pedo" rights, I am more importantly defending everyones rights, even yours to be able to say whatever you want about me. That is the essence of the First Amendment. If you want to say or write anything, you are supposed to be able to. Life, Liberty, Pursuit of Happiness. And if the "pedo" posts fuck with your sense of happiness, then dont read them...

Ethics is supposed to deal with the common good, and no good comes from any form of censorship. Lets get rid of the recent movie "Flowers of War", for its depiction of real life atrocities that happened during "The Rape of Nanking", because it deals with the same topics, even though the whole purpose of the movie is to educate the public so it doesnt happen again. Use that lump that sits on your shoulders for a second and realize that the government is notorious for taking more and more priviledges away once they get started and arent ever checked by someone or a group of someones with enough backbone to stand up and say this isnt right. My statement left morality and ethics out of it initially, and stuck to law, since it is what matters, but I respect your right to say whatever you want, and defend it too, dumbass... ;)

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
08 Feb 2012 9:45AM

"words DONT require real acts..."

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
08 Feb 2012 8:10AM

I'm not talking about the pictures fuck wad.. I'm talking about the discussions on the forum board you twat ass. By all means work in the boundaries of the laws when it comes to picture content.. But when it comes to typed text.. Leave it be

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
2
Anonymous
08 Feb 2012 8:39AM

i say put it all to the curb the best way to get rid of you sick fucks once and for all..I 100% support the mods and sick little fucktards like yourself will have to go somewhere else to spread your vomit of fucking kids you call fantisy..
My kudos to the mods and fuck you all

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
08 Feb 2012 9:48AM

Kudos to you for your right to say whatever you want, and that is the point. I could honestly care less about what the thread topic being censored is, I stand for my rights and everyone else's as a citizen of this country.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
08 Feb 2012 8:43AM

I'm not actually a pedo but I agree with not censoring the boards. Its fucking funny and entertaining as hell... Don't be a moral fag. That's what youporn is for

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
08 Feb 2012 10:01AM

okay all you moral fags out there... we may not be pedophiles...i for one am most certainly not. I value free thinking and freedom of speech... key word "speech" which includes word of mouth, letters, text, typing...anything that is used to convey interaction within a language that is not a visual picture or what not. Its really not fair that you call all of us free thinkers "pedophiles" when all we are doing is standing up for our rights as humans, let us be heard too.. because right now the only argument you people have is just what i said... just keep calling us pedophiles even though we most certainly are not.. We just believe in our freedoms

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
08 Feb 2012 10:18AM

If you are the only person who really gets it, then my message had purpose. ;)

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
08 Feb 2012 10:30AM

your damn rights it did man!
these people are just way to closed minded... its kinda sad how society is... yet if they were in our position say in 50 years where free thinking is a very prominant form of human thought in society theses cunts are gonna be the ones in our position screaming about freedom of speech and how they are allowed to critisize everything that comes out of our mouths.. let em. its not going to change who i am, hell it just gives me more determination!

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
08 Feb 2012 10:27AM

Ignore the morally superior retards that always comment on these things.
Here is a fact:

Claiming it's a breach of US law to allow non-nude non-sexual pics of kids on this site is a lie. Why won't Motherless admit it's a moral decision on their part not to allow ANY pics of children? 'Moral-free' my fucking ass!

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
08 Feb 2012 10:34AM

i agree.. if anything motherless should abandon the stigma of being a porn site, but instead become a moral free file sharing network within the borders of lawful content. ea. old not allowed. Im fine with that... i just posted a fucking picture of an amazing sammich i made on the random forum.. eating it right now and it tastes delicious... Let motherless become a hub for free content and free thinking alike, minus old.. and old does not include pedophiles talking about their fantasies.. as long as they do it safely in cyber land, its protecting the children in real life

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
08 Feb 2012 4:52PM

^^I agree with you dude, motherless has become real hypocrites with their �moral free zone� logo. This is nothing but an advertising lure to get people on their site. I don�t care how they want to run their site, and I or anyone else doesn�t have to come here if it doesn�t suit their taste, and its not my place or anyone else�s to dictate how the site is run.
But over the years, Motherless has tightened their ass on content more and more, I wonder why? It has become a site that would seem like law enforcement agencies are running it instead of average people. Motherless has lost its backbone, probably to all the threats that have come to them by moralfag anti-groups that would like to see porn off the internet all together if they had their way. But did the Motherless administration talk with their lawyers on how many of these threats were empty and would be thrown out in court?
OP, I stand with you on defending personal freedoms but abusing those freedoms will ruin it (AND IS RUINING IT) for all of us.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
08 Feb 2012 5:16PM

You can't abuse a freedom. That is why it is freedom. You can only grant it, or take it away. Once you attempt to put limitations on it, it is no longer free.

"The peculiar evil of silencing the expression of an opinion is, that it is robbing the human race; posterity as well as the existing generation; those who dissent from the opinion, still more than those who hold it. If the opinion is right, they are deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth: if wrong, they lose, what is almost as great a benefit, the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth, produced by its collision with error." -John Stuart Mill, On Liberty, 1859

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
08 Feb 2012 5:13PM

DEWEZ - Money before principles.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
2
Anonymous
08 Feb 2012 11:50PM

No, self preservation before jail. It's not fucking rocket science you assclown.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
09 Feb 2012 10:20AM

Its neither self-preservation nor jail, if you read any of this, its just censorship for the sake of, and that definitely isn't rocket science to figure out, assclown. ;)

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
2
Anonymous
08 Feb 2012 6:49PM

Geeze look at all the pedophiles banter on!!

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
08 Feb 2012 10:12PM

What you just said has proven my point... You fail at life unless you can provide a decent argument other then calling all of us pedophiles

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
08 Feb 2012 10:35PM

The Constitution, Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence no longer have meaning to the US Government. Without mercy they shit on the Red White And Blue continually. In order to save it you have to Burn it.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
2
Anonymous
08 Feb 2012 11:49PM

God you people are a bunch of fucking idiots. In the end, its Dewez who will go to jail if he stands up for his "principles" in the face of a government that is scrutinizing his site. It certainly won't be you fucktards. Are YOU willing to step up to the plate and take responsibility for all the shit that's going on here? Will YOU personally put your freedom and livelyhood on the line? Will you accept the consequences of total financial and social ruin? No? Didn't think so... pussies. If the USGOV wants you shut down, they are going to shut your ass down. Just ask Max Hardcore who is doing jail time even though he technically didn't do anything illegal. So shut the fuck up guys and be glad that this site is still even around. And for FUCKS SAKE, stay away for the illegal shit and report it when you see it. Enough!

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
09 Feb 2012 10:29AM

And if you read at all, I wasn't condoning any illegal activity. I was however, defending the rights we do have, you and I both. The same way you have the right to bash me in any way you feel at the moment, theyhave the right to write whatever trash they want on the confession boards. This topic isnt about pictures or video depicting sexual acts or even any that arent. This is about the First Amendment, and it being trampled on. If anyone does go to jail over this site, you can believe that it wasn't over a message board. Perhaps its all the other shit that is actually illegal stateside that ends up slipping through and lingering around on here. I have defended the First Amendment for ANYONE since I was in grade school and learned what it was. You should too, because when it is gone, and you find yourself behind bars for opening your mouth about anything that doesnt jive with that political agenda, maybe then you will realize that this is bigger than some posts about kids, and really about the right to say whatever you want, knowing that not everyone in this country ever agrees with everyone when they say anything and that is what makes it so great. The right to say fuck you, I dont agree. The very right you are expressing right now. The more you try to attack me, the more you too are exercising the exact same right that I am defending for you.

You are welcome in advance. ;)

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
09 Feb 2012 10:57AM

Oh and as for Max Hardcore, he is going to jail because he pretty much raped girls on camera. And yes, what he did was illegal. The dumbass filmed himself verbally abusing a women into letting him do things which she repeatedly stated she did not want to be doing. It falls under the category of harassment and coercion. Not to mention the watersports which are not only illegal but can be considered assault in most states. Also got caught in terms of "bait and switch", misleading the females in regards to what was going on, pay rates, etc... And the dumbass video documented all of it, creating a pretty solid case against him. And that is nowhere near what we are talking about here is it? Nice rant though. Got anymore?

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
09 Feb 2012 12:14AM

I stay away from the illegal stuff.. And once again I stand by my point that written word within a language is not illegal.. If they take down motherless they may as well take down lit erotica too.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
09 Feb 2012 12:24AM

You think they aren't targeting lit erotica too?

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
2
Aaniceguy
View posts View profile
09 Feb 2012 9:11AM

Wow I love these threads, you get worked up (oh no's i'm gonna get ban for talking about child porn on the boards) well that's what you get. It's his website he has every right to keep his website.

Like if the law enforcement told him to get most everything removed like jb, animal, death, other stuff they will. You guy's would be crying if the motherless did got shut down. Want to blame someone? Then blame the government.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
2
Aaniceguy
View posts View profile
09 Feb 2012 9:11AM

Wow I love these threads, you get worked up (oh no's i'm gonna get ban for talking about child porn on the boards) well that's what you get. It's his website he has every right to keep his website.

Like if the law enforcement told him to get most everything removed like jb, animal, death, other stuff they will. You guy's would be crying if the motherless did got shut down. Want to blame someone? Then blame the goverment.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
09 Feb 2012 10:37AM

I am not scared of being banned. That is laughable. You can technically run a website however you want within the laws of your area. And I happen to know the law of this area well enough to know that this specific topic, censoring boards, isn't one covered by law, its actually protected by it. One should be on a mission to remove anything illegal, however, we aren't talking about what is illegal at the moment, and technically we could sue for false advertising, since anything that is legal doesnt always stay under that criteria. When you have members, and those members join based on statements made by the company, in terms of business, you are supposed to have a moral obligation to satisfy any claims made by your company. Go ahead and give that some thought now. Censorship is the same as closing it in the end, so it doesnt matter. I will still be me if the site shuts down, so its whatever. But will you be you when you go to say a sentence, and it gets heard by someone who didnt like it, and then you find yourself behind bars? Because that is the future I fear, and why I stand proudly in defense of OUR, yours and mine and the sexual deviants too, rights entitled to us under this government. ;)

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Zagg
View posts View profile
09 Feb 2012 4:41PM

The H&R Block ad is certainly a good indication of why ML has been cleaning up the place.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Aaniceguy
View posts View profile
09 Feb 2012 5:35PM

Oo Zagg I hope you agree, this is lols now people want a right to sue over (no moral free zone)

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Zagg
View posts View profile
09 Feb 2012 6:29PM

Some people do get a bit hysterical.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
10 Feb 2012 2:43AM

Yep, and one of the most hysterical often times is a left-wing douchebag named Zagg.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
09 Feb 2012 9:22PM

Not want to, have technical grounds to, regardless of how well the case would hold up. Some people do get a bit illiterate.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
2
Anonymous
10 Feb 2012 12:13AM

And the only ones crying about it are the pedo lovers..Get rid of all that crap be my guest..And to the one saying if they talk about it on here they wont do it.in real life.It starts here as a fantasy then they get even more curious next thing you know your kid has been molested by one of these sick fucks..

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
10 Feb 2012 1:00AM

Actually studies have shown that since the internet came into being and child porn being relatively "easy" to get online the number of children being molested has gone down. Not that we should be encouraging people to look at child porn or anything, but the fact is there are many people have might have gone out and molested actual kids if they hadn't been able to just jerk off to that stuff on the internet.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Zagg
View posts View profile
10 Feb 2012 11:19AM

Post a rational comment, and what do you get? Abuse.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
2
Anonymous
10 Feb 2012 12:15AM

You sir are a pedo loving fucktard

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
10 Feb 2012 2:44AM

And you sir are a cowardly moralfag hater. See how easy that is?

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
10 Feb 2012 8:39AM

No the post just end3ed up in the wrong spot...nice try assclown

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
10 Feb 2012 1:11PM

Ok so let's say instead of "pedo" stuff, which is the only thing most of you seem to be able to wrap your minds around, it's any other topic whatsoever, and comments about it are being censored. I would be right here saying the same shit. What would any of you be saying in that moment? Hmm? Let's say Mormonism became the only tolerable religion in the land, along with its ideals and principles, and anyone who didn't willingly convert or accept it was locked up, or at minimum not allowed to express any viewpoint that didn't coincide with theirs. Where do you decide the line is drawn when it comes to personal freedom? People, just as any of you who feel the need to bash the person defending your rights, have a right to speak out, express hwo they feel or think or what they have problems with, stories, whatever. Did you like when the Nazi's burned books and worked of art? Do you not realize that you are basically defending actions like that? They didn't agree with what was written so they burned it. Volumes of great literature lost forever. Or perhaps you are from the Bible Belt and believe that science shouldn't be taught in school either. It is easy to isolate one aspect of this discussion and make an individual look unfashionable, but the basic truth is that trying to stop people from speaking out or thinking what they want is wrong, and deprives one of the most basic human needs. It is not for any of us to say how a person should think, unless you want to repeat the Spanish Inquisition, the Salem Witch Trials, revive Medieval Torture Dungeons, and stop touting ourselves as this great democracy, and call it a plain old dictatorship, then overthrow ourselves because thats what America does to dictators... lol. Wake up and smell what you are shoveling, because the real issues obviously are way over your head at the moment from how deep in it you are.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Zagg
View posts View profile
10 Feb 2012 1:21PM

Unfortunately, a great many people do want "to repeat the Spanish Inquisition, the Salem Witch Trials, revive Medieval Torture Dungeons". As long, of course, as it's not them who are being Inquisitioned, Witch Trialed, or Tortured. But when those sorts of processes get started, they tend to take on a life of their own. There are many cases of those who start the processes wind up being consumed by them. You'll never convince them of that beforehand, however. So, don't be surprised to hear a knock on the door in the middle of the night, before too long.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
10 Feb 2012 5:38PM

That's right, Zagg. And which governments are notorious for the behavior all throughout history that you just described? Communist, totalitarian, socialist governments that's who!

The exact types of government run collectivism that you espouse on nearly every single thread, communist Russia, communist Cuba, Red China, North Korea, National Socialist Germany, fascist Italy, are the ones that will knock on your door in the middle of the night, jail you, tear your family apart, unless you tow the party line & think the way they tell you to. Hello Gulag!

Amazing that someone who posts what you just posted above still has not learned the lessons of history.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
11 Feb 2012 12:16AM

None of those governments are communist. Its one of the biggest lies ever told is america, that communism is real. Its not. It never has been. All of those were brutal fascist dictatorships. Not communists. Communism is about equality, not a single person ruling the country and killing anyone that disagrees with them.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
11 Feb 2012 11:05PM

^You should stay off the crack, idiot....see what it did to Whitney?^

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
11 Feb 2012 11:42PM

No, you're just a moron that doesn't know what communism is. Calling yourself a communist doesn't make you a communist. This is exactly what stalin did. Why is it so hard to believe that a politician lied to get people to support him? I mean its not like it happens in this country right?

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
12 Feb 2012 1:12AM

^Please, just take your crack all at once so we can be rid of you^ Retard.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
06 Sep 2013 8:20PM

And what about the "communist" witch hunt in america
(Which was fruitless)

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
11 Feb 2012 11:57AM

Do you retards think pedos will just "go away" if you take all the old off the internet?
They will always be around, living next door to you maybe.
Nobody will ever know, until a child is molested.....to late.
With old in the internet, at least the LEA can find them and take care of them.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
11 Feb 2012 11:07PM

So someone that looks at an erotic pic on the interweb is the same as someone who molests a kid against their will? Fucking assclowns like you are why we have so many ridiculous laws, and why people who have consensual sex are in prison right now instead of drug dealers and murderers, fucking retard.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
11 Feb 2012 1:30PM

there goes the site being a moral free zone we have to many pussy's living in this country

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
12 Feb 2012 5:31PM

YOU MISINTERPRETED ME ME MORALFAG FUCKTARD! The LEA can, should, and probably does monitor and categorize people they watch every day. I think its fucking ridiculous to ban nudity, NO ONE can control how another will perceive nudity! And NO ONE has the right to control how another thinks. And NO ONE has the right to dictate to another how they should live their lives! So your an adult? fine, so is the fucker who is trying to treat you like a child by censoring what you can and cannot see. Censoring children is one thing, but the whole idea behind that theory is you are not yet ready for it, so as an adult, I WOULD GUESS YOUR READY TO TO DEAL WITH IT! So why are you still being treated like a child?
Because not everyone was raised the same way, some people have been conditioned in their upbringing to perceive nudity as something repulsive, so they try to push these "values" (as perceived by them) on you.
I am an anti-control type person, try to control me and I WILL KILL YOU! BUT, I am a live and let live type person as well, so you can do what you like as long as it doesn't hurt anyone. So yes, since I am an anti-control type person I do not like seeing children coerced or forced into sexual situations but I see nothing wrong with nudity AT ANY AGE!

SO GET A GRIP! before I loose mine.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
13 Feb 2012 12:10AM

This thread was supposed to be about censorship or words or speaking. Not images. Because that is something that is clearly defined in the law as to what is legal and what is not. But I do appreciate how passionately everyone is debating on this topic.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-1
Anonymous
13 Feb 2012 3:18AM

I have been away from this thread for a while and I'm quite disappointed In how it has progressed. For the love of fuck this is not about images or exclusively pedophilia. Please try to stay on topic. Its the censorship issue we are disputing.. It is illegal to censor words in my opinion. But by all means censor images as long as its illegal content

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
13 Feb 2012 4:46PM

^^HEY DUMBASS! Tell me the non physical differences between images and words! Both are used as a way to communicate (i.e. Hieroglyphs). No one banned the ancient Mediterranean cultures from drawing nudie pictures on the walls. And don't tell me that was then and this is now, people have really not changed in the big picture that much. Words can probably be more impacting then a picture because it more clearly defines something (unless you don't use the doubletalk employed by politicians).

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
13 Feb 2012 4:51PM

And as for censorship, if you are going to censor a thing you have to go �across the board� or it means nothing. As for �freedom of speech� issues, that�s up to you to work out.

SO LET IT BE WRITTEN, SO LET IT BE DONE.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
13 Feb 2012 5:28PM

I know my FBI friend loves this sight mostly for reading these types of posts. Scary thing is one day he decided to see if anyone interesting was on. In a matter of minutes he used their programs to find the real world name and address of someone logged on and that was through several proxies. He was even able to trace visitors that were not logged in. So if they you they can get you.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
2
MadCamel
View posts View profile
14 Feb 2012 3:36AM

Quite an intelligent conversation overall, with some pretty valid points all around. I was beginning to think the boards were 100% full of brain-dead whiny dumbasses. Thank you for proving me wrong guys. It's only 75% :)

Just to let you know, our policy is never to censor for the sake of censoring. Why would we build a site based on the concept that anything legal goes, then start pulling that shit?

If we're censoring something, there is usually a damn good reason for it. This site wouldn't be able to exist at all if we did not make such concessions from time to time. We'd be arrested on vague charges, or have our funding cut off. Call it selling out if you will - but we're far from rich.. And really enjoy not being locked in a cell.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
14 Feb 2012 4:42PM

^2^ I don�t doubt your story, and have never underestimated the feds and try to warn others who think they�re so smart. And that�s why I have been careful on what I do on the internet and log in through other peoples IPs. So your FBI friend will have to physically track me down to get me, if he deduces who I am when he gets here. That is also why I hate the internet and the government. In my opinion, a lot people can go to hell, and that includes those prying mother-fuckers that label themselves as �good guys� along with the sick puppies I have seen on the web.

Riddle:
Why does the law refer to apprehension of something a �bust�?

A:
Because they get off on it when it happens.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
15 Feb 2012 12:52PM

The constitution only protects your freedom of censorship from the government not places of business.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
16 Feb 2012 10:41AM

Sooooo...It would be legal for a business to install a spy cam in my house huh?

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Zagg
View posts View profile
16 Feb 2012 10:53AM

Electronic surveillance is not censorship. Actually, private entities don't censor, they exercise editorial judgment.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
16 Feb 2012 11:28AM

If freedom of censorship is only in the jurisdiction of businesses and not government, then why does it take a law to pass BY OUR GOVERNMENT to enforce censorship?

Censorship of the internet should be a matter of the websites owners (i.e. business) and not any governments responsibility.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.